出版道德与不当行为声明
编辑的职责
工业生物技术档案 编辑负责决定提交给期刊的哪些文章应在期刊当前卷中发表。编辑可能会受到期刊编辑委员会政策的指导，并受到有关诽谤、侵犯版权和抄袭的现行法律要求的约束。
工业生物技术档案 编辑随时评估稿件的知识内容，而不考虑作者或主办机构的性质，包括作者的种族、性别、性取向、宗教信仰、民族血统、公民身份或政治哲学。
工业生物技术档案 编辑不得向通讯作者、审稿人、潜在审稿人、其他编辑顾问和出版商（视情况而定）以外的任何人透露有关所提交稿件的任何信息。
未经作者明确书面同意，所提交稿件中披露的未发表材料不得用于编辑自己的研究。
当读者、作者或编辑委员会成员指出已发表作品中的真实错误但不导致作品无效时，将尽快发表更正（或勘误）。论文的在线版本可能会被更正，并附有更正日期和打印勘误表的链接。如果错误导致作品或其大部分内容无效，则可以启动撤回流程。在这种情况下，将尽快发布撤回通知并解释撤回原因。因此，有关撤回的消息将显示在文章页面和撤回文章的 PDF 版本中。
如果读者、审稿人或其他人对学术工作的行为、有效性或报告提出严重担忧，编辑将首先联系作者并允许他们对这些担忧做出回应。如果反应不令人满意，联盟学院将把此事提升到机构层面。
Journal of 工业生物技术档案 will respond to all allegations or suspicions of research or publication misconduct raised by readers, reviewers, or other editors. Cases of possible plagiarism or duplicate/redundant publication will be assessed by the journal. In other cases, allied academies may request an investigation by the institution or other appropriate bodies (after seeking an explanation from the authors first and if that explanation is unsatisfactory).
Retracted papers will be retained online, and they will be prominently marked as a retraction in all online versions, including the PDF, for the benefit of future readers.
Duties of Reviewers
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Editor will take reviewer misconduct seriously and pursue any allegation of breach of confidentiality, non-declaration of conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), inappropriate use of confidential material, or delay of peer review for competitive advantage. Allegations of serious reviewer misconduct, such as plagiarism, will be taken to the institutional level.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
作者应确保提交的作品是原创的，并且没有以任何语言在其他地方发表过，并且如果作者使用了其他人的作品和/或文字，则这些作品和/或文字已被适当引用或引用。
应遵守适用的版权法和惯例。版权材料（例如表格、数字或大量引文）只能在获得适当许可和确认的情况下进行复制。
一般来说，作者不应在多个期刊或主要出版物上发表描述基本相同研究的手稿。同时向多个期刊提交同一份稿件构成不道德的出版行为，是不可接受的。
必须始终对他人的工作给予适当的认可。作者应引用对确定所报告作品的性质有影响的出版物。
作者身份应仅限于那些对所报告研究的构思、设计、执行或解释做出重大贡献的人。所有做出重大贡献的人都应列为共同作者。
当作者发现自己发表的作品存在重大错误或不准确时，作者有义务及时通知期刊编辑或出版商，并配合编辑撤回或更正论文。